25-02-2014, 13:08
Además asociado a este sistema tienes otra ventaja, al tener un cambio seamless tienes 0 pérdida de potencia en frenada con lo cual tienes una carga más limpia y EFECTIVA del ERS frente a otros equipos que cada marcha que bajen tendrán una mínima pérdida de potencia provocando una carga no lineal del ERS.
Esto lo comentó Gary Anderson los primeros días de tests.
Gary Anderson wrote about this:
"The Ferrari F1 F14 T sounds a lot different to the other cars under braking. Why is this?
It is incredibly smooth on the downchanges. Everyone else is blipping the throttle a lot more and it's difficult to say why the Ferrari is so smooth in comparison.
All the cars have a zero torque loss upshift, seamless shift, but nobody has done that on the downshifts. With the ERS recharging from the rear wheels and the need to downchange under braking, it now might be a good idea.
We don't know for sure, but perhaps Ferrari is ahead of the game with such technology."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/112367
Esto lo comentó Gary Anderson los primeros días de tests.
Gary Anderson wrote about this:
"The Ferrari F1 F14 T sounds a lot different to the other cars under braking. Why is this?
It is incredibly smooth on the downchanges. Everyone else is blipping the throttle a lot more and it's difficult to say why the Ferrari is so smooth in comparison.
All the cars have a zero torque loss upshift, seamless shift, but nobody has done that on the downshifts. With the ERS recharging from the rear wheels and the need to downchange under braking, it now might be a good idea.
We don't know for sure, but perhaps Ferrari is ahead of the game with such technology."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/112367