Un comentario por mi parte: creo que todos tenemos derecho a opinar, siempre que se haga desde el respeto y desde una mínima humildad, ya que no tenemos todos los datos que tienen en el muro. A veces no hace falta mucho para ver que han metido la pata y a veces nos colamos.
En este caso, lo que dice Fry me parece definitivo:
Pat Fry: “A very intense race, which ended with one car on the podium and the other in the top six. There was not a moment’s respite, right from the start, with the top six all together in just a handful of seconds. We all started a bit blind in terms of how the tyres would behave, both as far as durability was concerned and how they would perform in the first laps of use. Furthermore, the rain was always lying in wait and appeared right in the final moments. Fernando and Felipe both drove impeccably, without making the slightest mistake, as was the case for the crew during the pit stops. As for the strategy, day after day, the option of the one stop became ever more clear and, in the end it was the best choice. Sure, with hindsight, it’s easy to say that if Fernando had stayed out on track for a few laps more, then maybe he could have also passed Rosberg and got on terms with Webber as well as Hamilton, given the time he did on his in-lap. I think this weather was a surprise for everyone, as was the difficulty encountered in getting the Softs up to temperature in their first laps. With just a few seconds to react, we took the most logical decision, which did all the same lead to a podium finish. It all goes to show how every detail is crucial in a championship as closely contested as this one. We need to continue pushing on the development of the car, because we are still not where we want to be in terms of performance.”
Resumiendo, que tuvieron que decidir muy rápido y que a todos les sorprendió lo que tardaban en calentar los blandos. Y que, básicamente, tomaron la decisión más lógica, la que tomaron los demás que estaban en podio
No se trata de criticar agriamente, pero tampoco de aceptar barco si porque si. Dicho eso, hay que reconocer que las cosas no se están haciendo mal y la prueba está en el liderato del mundial
En este caso, lo que dice Fry me parece definitivo:
Pat Fry: “A very intense race, which ended with one car on the podium and the other in the top six. There was not a moment’s respite, right from the start, with the top six all together in just a handful of seconds. We all started a bit blind in terms of how the tyres would behave, both as far as durability was concerned and how they would perform in the first laps of use. Furthermore, the rain was always lying in wait and appeared right in the final moments. Fernando and Felipe both drove impeccably, without making the slightest mistake, as was the case for the crew during the pit stops. As for the strategy, day after day, the option of the one stop became ever more clear and, in the end it was the best choice. Sure, with hindsight, it’s easy to say that if Fernando had stayed out on track for a few laps more, then maybe he could have also passed Rosberg and got on terms with Webber as well as Hamilton, given the time he did on his in-lap. I think this weather was a surprise for everyone, as was the difficulty encountered in getting the Softs up to temperature in their first laps. With just a few seconds to react, we took the most logical decision, which did all the same lead to a podium finish. It all goes to show how every detail is crucial in a championship as closely contested as this one. We need to continue pushing on the development of the car, because we are still not where we want to be in terms of performance.”
Resumiendo, que tuvieron que decidir muy rápido y que a todos les sorprendió lo que tardaban en calentar los blandos. Y que, básicamente, tomaron la decisión más lógica, la que tomaron los demás que estaban en podio
No se trata de criticar agriamente, pero tampoco de aceptar barco si porque si. Dicho eso, hay que reconocer que las cosas no se están haciendo mal y la prueba está en el liderato del mundial