G.P. ABU DABI 2012. EL SAFETY CAR JUEZ DE LA CARRERA

[ethernet]

El Abuelo ‏@Elabuelo_F1
Si os gustó el "morro flan".. veamoslo en acción

Lo peor es que el reglamento dice claramente:

3.15 Aerodynamic influence :
With the exception of the driver adjustable bodywork described in Article 3.18 (in addition to
minimal parts solely associated with its actuation) and the ducts described in Article 11.4, any
specific part of the car influencing its aerodynamic performance :
- Must comply with the rules relating to bodywork.
- Must be rigidly secured to the entirely sprung part of the car (rigidly secured means not
having any degree of freedom).
- Must remain immobile in relation to the sprung part of the car.
Any device or construction that is designed to bridge the gap between the sprung part of the
car and the ground is prohibited under all circumstances.
No part having an aerodynamic influence and no part of the bodywork, with the exception of
the skid block in 3.13 above, may under any circumstances be located below the reference
plane.
With the exception of the parts necessary for the adjustment described in Article 3.18, any car
system, device or procedure which uses driver movement as a means of altering the
aerodynamic characteristics of the car is prohibited.

Y para eso hay un montón de tests a tal efecto, pero si hay partes que no tienen test específico y que manifiestamente flexan más de la cuenta (como es el caso), la FIA puede hacer nuevos tests para evitarlo como dice el artículo 3.17.8:

3.17.8 In order to ensure that the requirements of Article 3.15 are respected, the FIA reserves the
right to introduce further load/deflection tests on any part of the bodywork which appears to
be (or is suspected of), moving whilst the car is in motion

Es decir, si la FIA quiere, para Austin tiene un test específico para esa zona y ya no pueden hacer eso.

Si la FIA quiere.................