23-02-2012, 15:32
(23-02-2012, 15:26)Truzone escribió: Yo no veo que la FIA sea la que la ha podido liar, en el caso de que sea cierto, sino los motoristas, de todas formas Whiting se ha remitido a este parrafo para el tema de los motores:
Cita:3.15 Aerodynamic influence :
With the exception of the driver adjustable bodywork described in Article 3.18 (in addition to minimal
parts solely associated with its actuation) and the ducts described in Article 11.4, any specific part
of the car influencing its aerodynamic performance :
-
Must comply with the rules relating to bodywork ;
-
Must be rigidly secured to the entirely sprung part of the car (rigidly secured means not
having any degree of freedom) ;
-
Must remain immobile in relation to the sprung part of the car.
Any device or construction that is designed to bridge the gap between the sprung part of the car
and the ground is prohibited under all circumstances.
No part having an aerodynamic influence and no part of the bodywork, with the exception of the
skid block in 3.13 above, may under any circumstances be located below the reference plane.
With the exception of the parts necessary for the adjustment described in Article 3.18, any car
system, device or procedure which uses, or is suspected of using, driver movement as a means of
altering the aerodynamic characteristics of the car is prohibited.
Los motores Mercedes no usan el soplado frio, sino el caliente así que de problemas de fiabilidad nada. En la Directiva Técnica ya mencionaban que tenían que retocar el sistema de las valvulas para los motores, sino lo han hecho estaban advertidos al respecto. Lo que si se ha comentado Whiting es que en Australia quien no cumpla no compite.
Puedes explicar en que impide este articulo el uso del soplado? Como se puede escudar Charlie para decirles que nones?