24-02-2012, 12:00
Schumi: 10 soft - 14 soft - 16 hard - 19 hard
Webbo: 13 soft - 16 hard - 15 medium - 7 soft
IMHO you shoult taking of Schumacher's first 8 laps to the right correction
SIMULACIÓN DE CARRERA (WEBBER - SCHUMI)
Webber Schumacher
soft vs soft
1:29.562 1:29.836
1:29.684 1:30.181
1:30.650 1:30.334
1:29.720 1:31.282
1:29.851 1:30.307
1:30.939 1:30.836
1:30.212 1:32.116
1:30.153 1:31.171
1:30.265 1:31.583
1:30.762 1:32.456
1:30.816
1:30.910
1:31.588
Webber Shumacher
hard vs soft
1:27.751 1:28.720
1:28.376 1:29.613
1:28.583 1:29.645
1:28.768 1:29.782
1:28.762 1:29.985
1:28.944 1:29.779
1:29.316 1:29.911
1:29.751 1:29.785
1:29.233 1:30.093
1:29.478 1:30.286
1:30.147 1:30.568
1:30.083 1:30.918
1:30.206 1:30.940
1:30.416 1:31.223
1:30.475
1:33.848
Webber Schumacher
medium vs hard
1:26.657 1:28.473
1:27.388 1:28.784
1:27.340 1:28.822
1:27.539 1:29.109
1:27.733 1:29.005
1:27.985 1:29.358
1:28.166 1:29.146
1:28.572 1:29.468
1:28.105 1:29.937
1:28.218 1:30.041
1:28.572 1:29.687
1:28.778 1:30.123
1:30.242 1:29.997
1:29.528 1:29.993
1:29.425 1:30.268
****** 1:30.170
Webber Schumacher
soft vs hard
1:24.771 1:26.592
1:25.932 1:26.676
1:25.927 1:27.114
1:26.051 1:26.748
1:27.674 1:27.486
1:27.097 1:27.507
1:26.920 1:27.663
****** 1:27.590
****** 1:27.698
****** 1:27.712
****** 1:27.531
****** 1:27.611
****** 1:27.950
****** 1:27.901
****** 1:28.006
****** 1:28.146
****** 1:28.631
****** 1:29.127
****** 1:28.852
Webber abortó el final de su simulación pero,a falta de cargas de combustible, se aprecia un mejor rendimmieto en general del australiano....el soplado es lo que tiene.
Webbo: 13 soft - 16 hard - 15 medium - 7 soft
IMHO you shoult taking of Schumacher's first 8 laps to the right correction
SIMULACIÓN DE CARRERA (WEBBER - SCHUMI)
Webber Schumacher
soft vs soft
1:29.562 1:29.836
1:29.684 1:30.181
1:30.650 1:30.334
1:29.720 1:31.282
1:29.851 1:30.307
1:30.939 1:30.836
1:30.212 1:32.116
1:30.153 1:31.171
1:30.265 1:31.583
1:30.762 1:32.456
1:30.816
1:30.910
1:31.588
Webber Shumacher
hard vs soft
1:27.751 1:28.720
1:28.376 1:29.613
1:28.583 1:29.645
1:28.768 1:29.782
1:28.762 1:29.985
1:28.944 1:29.779
1:29.316 1:29.911
1:29.751 1:29.785
1:29.233 1:30.093
1:29.478 1:30.286
1:30.147 1:30.568
1:30.083 1:30.918
1:30.206 1:30.940
1:30.416 1:31.223
1:30.475
1:33.848
Webber Schumacher
medium vs hard
1:26.657 1:28.473
1:27.388 1:28.784
1:27.340 1:28.822
1:27.539 1:29.109
1:27.733 1:29.005
1:27.985 1:29.358
1:28.166 1:29.146
1:28.572 1:29.468
1:28.105 1:29.937
1:28.218 1:30.041
1:28.572 1:29.687
1:28.778 1:30.123
1:30.242 1:29.997
1:29.528 1:29.993
1:29.425 1:30.268
****** 1:30.170
Webber Schumacher
soft vs hard
1:24.771 1:26.592
1:25.932 1:26.676
1:25.927 1:27.114
1:26.051 1:26.748
1:27.674 1:27.486
1:27.097 1:27.507
1:26.920 1:27.663
****** 1:27.590
****** 1:27.698
****** 1:27.712
****** 1:27.531
****** 1:27.611
****** 1:27.950
****** 1:27.901
****** 1:28.006
****** 1:28.146
****** 1:28.631
****** 1:29.127
****** 1:28.852
Webber abortó el final de su simulación pero,a falta de cargas de combustible, se aprecia un mejor rendimmieto en general del australiano....el soplado es lo que tiene.